by Lance Kennedy (Posted Sun Dec 01, 2013 3:54 am)
http://phys.org/news164348909.html
To Daedalus
The reference above is another report on DNA damage and risk of cancer from cannabis.
Insisting on original studies is not really very rational. It is difficult to find such studies on the internet, but mags like phys.org, or sciencedaily are reputable. Their reports are pretty much correct.
Tell me. If you are not a pothead, why are you so insistent that cannabis is harmless?
After all, with all those reports of studies finding harm, at least some must be correct. I know that no study is so definitive that someone cannot cast doubt on it, and this is true for the cannabis studies showing harm to health. But even if only 1 in 3 of those studies is correct, that adds up to a lot of harm.
Read Main Topic
http://phys.org/news164348909.html
To Daedalus
The reference above is another report on DNA damage and risk of cancer from cannabis.
Insisting on original studies is not really very rational. It is difficult to find such studies on the internet, but mags like phys.org, or sciencedaily are reputable. Their reports are pretty much correct.
Tell me. If you are not a pothead, why are you so insistent that cannabis is harmless?
After all, with all those reports of studies finding harm, at least some must be correct. I know that no study is so definitive that someone cannot cast doubt on it, and this is true for the cannabis studies showing harm to health. But even if only 1 in 3 of those studies is correct, that adds up to a lot of harm.
Read Main Topic